WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — Deep in the cane fields south of Lake Okeechobee, a massive construction site sits abandoned along U.S. 27, its dreams for the Everglades unfulfilled.
Bulldozers and earthmovers reduced a vast swath of these 25 square miles to a gray moonscape of pooled water and piled rock — traces from what was supposed to have become the world's largest free-standing reservoir.
Officially called the A1 Reservoir, this environmental Stonehenge carried an $800 million price tag and big-name endorsements from the likes of Al Gore and Jeb Bush.
The plan was to build an above-ground lake of colossal dimensions to feed water into the parched Everglades. It would be nearly the size of Boca Raton and hold more water than 100,000 Olympic-size swimming pools. Its 22-mile perimeter wall would stand three stories tall. Construction was slated to end next year.
Instead, the project has become one of the most expensive false starts in the largely fruitless effort to restore the Everglades, in which the A1 Reservoir was a crucial element.
Two years and $272 million into construction, the South Florida Water Management District suddenly ordered work on the reservoir halted in May 2008. Six months later, water managers canceled construction altogether, incurring fees and penalties that could add up to another $40 million.
The land may still be used to repair the Everglades, but much of the money spent can never be recaptured — for example, $113 million to build a rock-crushing plant that contractors later dismantled. And about 200 workers who say they were promised at least three years of work were laid off.
The shutdown coincided with Gov. Charlie Crist's announcement of an even bolder and costlier Everglades restoration initiative: a $1.75 billion state buyout of U.S. Sugar Corp. and its 180,000-acre farming empire, land perfectly situated to recreate the historic flows of the Everglades.
Water managers say Crist's U.S. Sugar deal, made public in June 2008, did not influence their decision one month earlier to halt work on the A1 Reservoir. But today, officials concede they cannot afford to pay for both at once, even though Crist has trimmed the U.S. Sugar deal to $536 million for 73,000 acres.
The land deal will require scrapping the reservoir plan, as the larger Everglades restoration blueprint is overhauled to incorporate the new acreage. It's worth it, say the governor and his environmental allies, who view the U.S. Sugar deal as a historic opportunity.
"I think the benefits of doing better in the long run far exceed the costs," said district board member Shannon Estenoz.
But others question whether the change of course was worth the extraordinary expense — not to mention the delay in rescuing an ecosystem on the verge of collapse.
"What the district has done was to walk away from the original Everglades restoration plan," said Mike Collins, a district board member and critic of the U.S. Sugar deal. "We were ready to go, and now we're in limbo."
The A1 Reservoir project grew out of its own celebrated land purchase.
In December 1997, then-Vice President Gore announced that the state and federal governments would buy out the Talisman Sugar Corp. The 63,000 acres acquired in the $152 million deal would be used to store and cleanse billions of gallons of water to help hydrate the Everglades.
Completed in 1999, it was at the time the largest single land deal aimed at Everglades restoration. Years later, the water district carved out a 16,700-acre portion and called it the A1 Reservoir.
The reservoir was to be a keystone of a 68-piece, $10.9 billion Everglades restoration plan that Congress passed in 2000. The deal called for the state and feds to split the costs 50-50, but bickering between the parties and a lack of money from Congress ground the restoration to a crawl.
Estenoz said she's hopeful that the days of inertia are over for the restoration, based on promises from the Obama administration to loosen the flow of dollars from Washington.
"The problem over the last eight or nine years has been one of leadership," she said.
Gov. Bush thought as much in 2004, when he proposed to break through the paralysis with "Acceler8," a $1.5 billion program in which the district would borrow the money to build the 62-billion-gallon A1 Reservoir and other Everglades projects.
New obstacles arose, however. For one, the reservoir's estimated $400 million price tag doubled, which the state blamed on rising construction costs and tougher levee-construction standards set after Hurricane Katrina.
The were other, more questionable expenses that the contractor, Barnard Parsons Joint Venture, tried to add to the bill — about $18 million worth, a district audit reported. For example, the audit found that the company charged wear-and-tear on its pickup trucks that amounted to twice the cost of replacing the entire fleet.
In another cloud over the project, the Natural Resources Defense Council and two other environmental groups sued the Corps of Engineers in May 2007, demanding assurances that the reservoir would serve only the Everglades, not farms or development.
The groups explicitly said they did not want construction halted. But the district did just that one year later, citing uncertainty over the suit's outcome. Environmentalists were dumbfounded.
"We actually wrote them a letter and said, 'This is ridiculous,'" said NRDC attorney Brad Sewell. "It was pretty clear they were going to blame it on us."
A month later, Crist went public with news of the U.S. Sugar deal, which the state had been negotiating for months. The A1 plans would have to change.
Unmentioned was a full accounting of the penalties for shutting down the reservoir project: Six monthly payments of $1.9 million to suspend the project. An additional $1.5 million payment for canceling the contract. And as much as $26 million to break down the construction operation.
Meanwhile, the jobs that the state had repeatedly boasted of disappeared.
"They were tossing 200 onto the job market in Belle Glade," said Troy Mann, one of the workers, who have since filed a class-action suit against the district and contractor. "Most of them couldn't get work. ... It was a terrible disaster."
As for that NRDC lawsuit, a judge in June dismissed the case as moot, noting that the A1 Reservoir has been scrapped.
In the final order, U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks quotes former Chief Justice Warren Burger: "It is not the function of the judiciary to provide 'effective leadership' simply because the political branches of government fail to do so."
Paul Quinlan writes for The Palm Beach Post. E-mail: paul(underscore)quinlan(at)pbpost.com.